Thanks,
Stephen
(One last aside about the "frisbee golf" name, since that's a matter of it's own.... It basically comes down to copyright. If you aren't familiar with the origins of disc golf, Wham-O has the Frisbee name trademarked; otherwise, this site would be probably be called FGCR. Others have pointed this out in the thread; we're not so thin-skinned to get upset about being called whatever the public chooses.)
Good response Stephen. Lots of people commenting on the "Frisbee golf" thing. Let's be clear about something here, which I think is illustrative of Ken's general approach and attitude: Ken is accusing the disc golf proponents involved of using the term "Frisbee golf" when addressing the general public because it sounds harmless, whereas if they were saying "disc golf" everybody would see through the lies. It's a pretty good example of the dishonest and hyperbolic approach he and his organization are taking to this issue. He sees the use of the term "Frisbee golf" as part of a devious conspiracy.
Ken, it's been good to get your perspective and for a while there I thought you could be reasonable. But for every evenhanded thing you've written, including admitting that you are working outside of your community against disc golf development, you've followed it up with more unreasonable and clearly dishonest rhetoric. Someone local could start an organization and a website that treats your group the way you are treating disc golf. Distortion, dishonesty, and fear mongering. The way you and SMP are operating invites conflict and backlash, unfortunately. You've gone well over the line of protecting your "turf" against a recreational development, and show no signs of being someone or an organization that any sane person would want to work with or achieve compromise.
I hope you can get some perspective on how you and your organization are mishandling the situation in your anger and bile toward a group trying to bring a recreational amenity that would be very popular to the park you live near.