shalomar
Newbie
What do the numbers associated with discs mean, e.g., Shark mid range (4,4,0,2)? Negative vs. positive? thx
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
This should tell you all you need to know.
I know that it's Innova who does the ratings and it's their own homepage, but the speed description is just wrong.
"SPEED| Speed is the ability of the disc to cut through the air. Speed Ratings are listed from 1 to 13. Discs with high numbers are faster. Faster discs go farther into the wind with less effort. Slower discs take more power to throw, but have less of a chance to fly past the basket."
IMO speed mainly tells you about how fast (=far) you have to be able to throw for the disc to fly "normal". By normal i mean the disc does not just make the typical beginner hyzer. That's why beginners can control a slow disc like a putter or a mid earlier than they learn control over their big drivers.
It's ridiculous that Innova makes such blatant mistakes on their own homepage with the rating system they invented themself...
Then there's the inability to see how a disc should/will eventually fly to see what the 'true' numbers are when you're learning unless a more experienced player throws it for you.
What they mean when they say that is that faster discs lose less distance into a headwind. In other words, they penetrate better into a headwind. So if you only throw a Destroyer 10' farther than a Teebird in calm conditions, you may throw it 30' farther in a 15MPH headwind (numbers totally made up). IMO, it's a more accurate description than what you get from 90%+ of people who try to describe disc speed."SPEED| Speed is the ability of the disc to cut through the air. Speed Ratings are listed from 1 to 13. Discs with high numbers are faster. Faster discs go farther into the wind with less effort. Slower discs take more power to throw, but have less of a chance to fly past the basket."
This is a weird way to explain it. Including wind into the description of speed confuses the issue. Fast discs don't go further with less effort, but they do fly "faster" in a headwind, because the headwind increases the relative speed of the disc. So the wind acts as a boost to arm speed. I've heard that pros (KC I think) like to use slower discs powered down into headwinds and let the wind bring the disc up to speed.
You're confusing the traditional definition of the word "speed" with the disc golf jargon word "speed." Innova defines the disc golf version well.discs fly as fast as you are able to throw them. You cant suddenly throw discs faster just cause you switch from a speed 8 to a speed 14 disc.
the speed number indicates how fast you have to throw the disc so that it flies like the stability, glide and fade numbers indicate.
You're confusing the traditional definition of the word "speed" with the disc golf jargon word "speed." Innova defines the disc golf version well.
I think it's that people are trying to apply what they think speed means, which might be wrong, to Innova's definition rather than just trying to understand what they wrote. The definition isn't confusing if you don't try to read things into it that aren't there.You spelled "weird" wrong.
Innova is confusng the definition to those trying to understand it. If it takes a team to explain what Innova meant when they wrote it, maybe it's definition is flawed.
discs fly as fast as you are able to throw them. You cant suddenly throw discs faster just cause you switch from a speed 8 to a speed 14 disc.
the speed number indicates how fast you have to throw the disc so that it flies like the stability, glide and fade numbers indicate.
"Faster" discs tend to be more difficult to throw and require more nose down and initial speed to fly as intended, but those are byproducts of a higher disc "speed," not a way to define "speed."
I think it's that people are trying to apply what they think speed means, which might be wrong, to Innova's definition rather than just trying to understand what they wrote. The definition isn't confusing if you don't try to read things into it that aren't there.