Alexplz
Double Eagle Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2013
- Messages
- 1,923
I figure this sort of fits better here than in the actual bag feedback subforum because it's more focused on the discs themselves and the dynamic between the slots in your bag.
When putting your bag together, is it better to build from the ground up, or top down?
Here's what I mean - on one hand, you can go from the ground up by grabbing a stack of your favorite discs. Here's an example:
S Wizard, DX Roc, X Buzzz, GStar TeeBird, C-FD, Lucid Escape
These constitute a bag, or at least the start of one. There is some overlap, and you are missing some archetypes, but if you pick and choose what else you want to add you'll be fine... until it comes time to decide what midrange mold is best suited to hit that gap...
Alternatively, you could build from the top down, filling in a structure like the sticky in the bag forum, or one like this:
putters:
OS / S / US
mids:
OS / S / US
fairways:
OS / S / US
distance:
OS / S / US
This way, you are sticking to a plan and might end up choosing a roc cycle over bagging that additional buzzz. In fact, you might realize that some of your favorite discs don't fit the bill when filling in the above slots, or that bagging your favorite discs would cause overlap or mold overload. So in theory, you have your bases covered, but you might not "click" with some of your selections like you otherwise would. :\
These are just exaggerated examples, but my point remains - sometimes I find that my fondness for a mold or specific disc gets in the way of putting together a truly harmonious bag, but I wonder if it's worth it anyway. What do you guys think?
When putting your bag together, is it better to build from the ground up, or top down?
Here's what I mean - on one hand, you can go from the ground up by grabbing a stack of your favorite discs. Here's an example:
S Wizard, DX Roc, X Buzzz, GStar TeeBird, C-FD, Lucid Escape
These constitute a bag, or at least the start of one. There is some overlap, and you are missing some archetypes, but if you pick and choose what else you want to add you'll be fine... until it comes time to decide what midrange mold is best suited to hit that gap...
Alternatively, you could build from the top down, filling in a structure like the sticky in the bag forum, or one like this:
putters:
OS / S / US
mids:
OS / S / US
fairways:
OS / S / US
distance:
OS / S / US
This way, you are sticking to a plan and might end up choosing a roc cycle over bagging that additional buzzz. In fact, you might realize that some of your favorite discs don't fit the bill when filling in the above slots, or that bagging your favorite discs would cause overlap or mold overload. So in theory, you have your bases covered, but you might not "click" with some of your selections like you otherwise would. :\
These are just exaggerated examples, but my point remains - sometimes I find that my fondness for a mold or specific disc gets in the way of putting together a truly harmonious bag, but I wonder if it's worth it anyway. What do you guys think?