discallday
Birdie Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 268
"Just gonna throw these fribees towards the basket, and then try to throw them inTO the basket." (First minute of https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=51&v=_rR_Iumg-bM)
Sometimes discussion between interviewers and players regarding game plan or strategy is funny. This is the case in many sports, with many athletes, but dg does seem to have a set of oft repeated game plan answers, such as "stay in bounds," "play safe," "take birdies when they come," etc. Basically, stay on the safe side of balancing risk-reward, because this tends to produce lower scores on average.
These kinds of answers are so frequently used, that they can make the player and/or the interviewer appear slightly silly. For the player, I sometimes think: well I guess it's not a clearly elaborated strategy that's separating their performance from the rest of us lesser disc golfers. For the interviewer, I sometimes think: what did you expect them to say - "summon the wind god to send opponents' shots OB on hole 8, and then prey on their weakened mental state by casting the imperius curse, thus destroying the rest of their round?"
Since disc golf is a game of a player against themselves and the course, the idea of strategy, which usually revolves around offense and defense in other sports, doesn't always seem to be particularly developed. Or conversely, a player might have clearly established ideas about what they will try to do on many/all of the holes, but the nature of the general "game plan" question does not always open the door for such a detailed answer.
I'm not 100% sure what to make of Locastro's answer. Perhaps he was implicitly poking fun at the game plan question a la: "c'mon Terry, I'm not gonna give you a rundown of our complete strategy on my 30 second walk to the first hole before the round starts."
Or maybe: "C'mon Terry, I'm Nikko ef*in Locastro, I don't follow game plans. And for that matter, any rapscallion who does is missing the point of disc golf."
But the most likely interpretation seems to be that Locastro simply didn't give this 2nd of 2 doubles rounds much prior thought - which is hard to fault, because (as Miller alludes to) with the alternating tee-shot format in this round, play can be difficult to predict/plan for.
Though the game plan question is not a creative one to ask, I think in this video it did serve to establish the relaxed atmosphere in this less serious of events, which actually was pretty appropriate. But has anyone else had similar thoughts that certain interviewers should more fully consider how they're wording their questions, or what they're trying to find out with their strategy questions? Or, has anyone else thought that the strategy question is completely useless? Etc.?
Sometimes discussion between interviewers and players regarding game plan or strategy is funny. This is the case in many sports, with many athletes, but dg does seem to have a set of oft repeated game plan answers, such as "stay in bounds," "play safe," "take birdies when they come," etc. Basically, stay on the safe side of balancing risk-reward, because this tends to produce lower scores on average.
These kinds of answers are so frequently used, that they can make the player and/or the interviewer appear slightly silly. For the player, I sometimes think: well I guess it's not a clearly elaborated strategy that's separating their performance from the rest of us lesser disc golfers. For the interviewer, I sometimes think: what did you expect them to say - "summon the wind god to send opponents' shots OB on hole 8, and then prey on their weakened mental state by casting the imperius curse, thus destroying the rest of their round?"
Since disc golf is a game of a player against themselves and the course, the idea of strategy, which usually revolves around offense and defense in other sports, doesn't always seem to be particularly developed. Or conversely, a player might have clearly established ideas about what they will try to do on many/all of the holes, but the nature of the general "game plan" question does not always open the door for such a detailed answer.
I'm not 100% sure what to make of Locastro's answer. Perhaps he was implicitly poking fun at the game plan question a la: "c'mon Terry, I'm not gonna give you a rundown of our complete strategy on my 30 second walk to the first hole before the round starts."
Or maybe: "C'mon Terry, I'm Nikko ef*in Locastro, I don't follow game plans. And for that matter, any rapscallion who does is missing the point of disc golf."
But the most likely interpretation seems to be that Locastro simply didn't give this 2nd of 2 doubles rounds much prior thought - which is hard to fault, because (as Miller alludes to) with the alternating tee-shot format in this round, play can be difficult to predict/plan for.
Though the game plan question is not a creative one to ask, I think in this video it did serve to establish the relaxed atmosphere in this less serious of events, which actually was pretty appropriate. But has anyone else had similar thoughts that certain interviewers should more fully consider how they're wording their questions, or what they're trying to find out with their strategy questions? Or, has anyone else thought that the strategy question is completely useless? Etc.?