Disc Fiend
* Ace Member *
Millennium Discs are like a mystery to me. I don't really know too much about them, they intrigue me, and I want to find out more opcorn:
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
you could be right, but the olf was more comfortable for me as it seemed to have a slightly narrower rim for my girly hands. I didnt spend too much time with the pd though.I may be wrong but thought the OLF and PD shared the same wing (i.e. FB)
Anyone know the value of an 7/10 First Run (1.1) Sirius JLS? I have one that I am thinking about putting up in the market place.
Short answer: don't use the MST flight guide.Some questions I have after looking at MST's flight guide:
1. The MS, Which is described as being basically a beadless Roc, is more overstable then a Roc?? how is that possible?
2. I have heard the JLS is very similar to the Teebird, but on the flight guide it is listed as understable, so which one is it?
I know that flight guides aren't perfect or always right, so that is why I am asking you guys. I was looking at these two discs to compliment my Rocs and Teebirds. Thanks in advance for the responses!
Some questions I have after looking at MST's flight guide:
2. I have heard the JLS is very similar to the Teebird, but on the flight guide it is listed as understable, so which one is it?
Short answer: don't use the MST flight guide.
The Aurora MS is less overstable than a Roc out of the box. It's a pretty neutral midrange. The QMS may or may not be less overstable than any given Roc depending on the run of each. On average they're probably less overstable, though. I'd think that the Aurora MS would be a decent complement to a new Roc if you need something less overstable and can't wait to beat up a Roc, but once you have a beat Roc the Aurora MS would be overlap. The Aurora MS and QMS are really meant to be paired with something more overstable than a Roc and in high end plastic like a Q or Sirius Sentinel MF.
The JLS is more workable than a Roc (less HSS but keeps a harder fade), but isn't ideal because it tends to be a straight driver as well, so I'm not sure it's the absolute best complement to a Roc. There are other, more workable drivers that are easier to throw on 'S' curves (Eagle-X, Cyclone, Gazelle, etc.) that are probably better candidates. Granted, the difference isn't huge so YMMV.
Correct.I think in Garu's 2nd paragraph he is answering with respect to the JLS v Teebird and where is says Roc it should probably be Teebird
Qolf are only speed 9 but have 425'+ potential with a smooth throw.