If it's a 300 gram disc, then 3g is 1%
Yeah, 1.7% was established a while ago
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
If it's a 300 gram disc, then 3g is 1%
The heavier they are, the better they are for throwing at OMD.
I mean i appreciate this stance in principal, but it practice it is a bit much. The weight rule is intended to prevent injury i believe. But even so, if it truly bothers you, just sell/give them away.
This whole thread is ridiculous because if the OP really had integrity, they would not broadcast to the world how much integrity they have or even bother asking the question.
I would say that if you know the discs are illegal, then you shouldn't throw them in a competition. Mentally, I know i would be thinking about it on every throw. I don't worry about someone calling me on it, it just feels wrong.
The solution of course is not to weigh your max weight discs. If you don't know, it won't interfere in your mental processes. I personally can't throw max weight.
If it's a 300 gram disc, then 3g is 1%
oldmandiscer is all about following rules of governing body.
oldmandiscer is all about following rules of governing body.
OMD is a lickspittle for the Man!
813A states that players may not play with discs that do not meet the PDGA Disc Golf Technical Standards. However, as I read them, the technical standards themselves place the requirements on the manufacturers to gain approval for discs to be produced and to produce legal discs. The onus is not on the players to redo the work required of the disc manufacturers. Buying approved disc molds, produced and sold by an approved manufacturer, and not subsequently altering them in an illegal way, is the extent of what's required of the players under the rules.
If, for example, Innova was selling discs in their F2 shop that were marketed as out of spec, and stamped as such, then a player could be sanctioned for violating 813A if they used them in sanctioned play. If the disc was overweight, and they altered it down to legal weight, even simply through wear, I'd argue they still could be sanctioned. If the player bought and used a non-PDGA approved disc from some knockoff manufacturer, that would also be sanctionable. Otherwise, any sanction would seem to be limited to disapproving the discs manufactured and sold as legal, if the manufacturer was not in compliance with PDGA specifications in their production.
As should everyone, especially when it involves following rules of competition. You don't follow them, then you are simply a cheater. Some people are ok with that and others are not.
So if a manufacturer is selling new discs overweight/out of spec then what? Player is unknowingly breaking the rules. I can see saying the onus is on the company, for sure.
But then the problem falls onto the player who purchased out of spec discs and if he/she finds them to be out of spec then what? Throw them anyways?
The thing is that there are a lot of specs. You are obsessing over a spec that you feel like you can accurately measure yourself, but what about all the other specs? Are we responsible for checking that all of our small-diameter drivers actually molded out the the 21cm spec? Are we responsible for making sure the flight plate of every disc we throw does not exceed 0.5 cm in thickness? Do we have to conduct the leading-edge radius test and flex test on all of out discs?But then the problem falls onto the player who purchased out of spec discs and if he/she finds them to be out of spec then what? Throw them anyways?