zrxchris
Birdie Member
Our City has spent $40 in the last 18 months on disc golf, improvements to the existing course and developing 2 new courses in short order and has plans for more perhaps.
So in Alabama out state coordinator and a large majority of the regular TD's say that no public courses charge a rental fee (only a couple of privates' Red Arsenal & an Off-road Park), not have any stipulations that you should rent a shelter either. Examples being a recent large C Tier in a small town that drew over 60 but the TD/Vendor set up shop in the parking lot and the City did not see any direct use revenue from the event, only money spent in town. The event drew many overnight stays, but with few traveling pro's most all transient guests crashed with local city's club members.
My 2day tourney drew only 40ppl but was a true amateur event where the Tourism Commission paid for facilities rental thru a cash sponsorship. A good cash added purse drew several out of state players who did stay at local hotels and came early for practice.
The City did research and saw many small city municipal courses charge $75-$125 a day for course rental and discounted shelter rental if you rented the course. Local promoters are shying away from using our courses or trying to circumvent the process entirely and just use without notifying the parks dept.
From marketing standpoint the City most likely needs to cut rates in half or not charge as the local market (within 50 miles for sure) does not charge for course rental. All courses are fairly equal with amenities such as bathrooms, gyms etc.
What is like your neck of the woods, if the city spends a lot of dough to improve DG Courses should expect rental income even if very small amount or should the course always be free to use for tourneys?
So in Alabama out state coordinator and a large majority of the regular TD's say that no public courses charge a rental fee (only a couple of privates' Red Arsenal & an Off-road Park), not have any stipulations that you should rent a shelter either. Examples being a recent large C Tier in a small town that drew over 60 but the TD/Vendor set up shop in the parking lot and the City did not see any direct use revenue from the event, only money spent in town. The event drew many overnight stays, but with few traveling pro's most all transient guests crashed with local city's club members.
My 2day tourney drew only 40ppl but was a true amateur event where the Tourism Commission paid for facilities rental thru a cash sponsorship. A good cash added purse drew several out of state players who did stay at local hotels and came early for practice.
The City did research and saw many small city municipal courses charge $75-$125 a day for course rental and discounted shelter rental if you rented the course. Local promoters are shying away from using our courses or trying to circumvent the process entirely and just use without notifying the parks dept.
From marketing standpoint the City most likely needs to cut rates in half or not charge as the local market (within 50 miles for sure) does not charge for course rental. All courses are fairly equal with amenities such as bathrooms, gyms etc.
What is like your neck of the woods, if the city spends a lot of dough to improve DG Courses should expect rental income even if very small amount or should the course always be free to use for tourneys?
Last edited: