dustinkirk
Newbie
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2011
- Messages
- 16
Those are some great suggestions. To minimize setup time I skipped creating a wizard and from the feedback I've received, it sounds like that was a good decision.
Regarding renaming holes, that's doable, but could be tedious. As changing the name for one means you'd have to change the names for all of the following holes. Do you see it happening in some other way? If it is tedious, do you think it would be be used? I suppose it might be worth it when you can duplicate saved games.
I'll see what I can do with the sizing for fewer than 6 players. I'm pretty much locked in height wise do to showing 9 holes, but the width could be flexible.
Someone emailed me requesting an option to track the number of putts per hole, would anyone else find this useful too?
It also sounds like defaulting pars to 3 for new games would be good. Any objections? I'm thinking it would pre fill the first 18 and the rest would be blank so you wouldn't have to remove a lot of pars for a 19 or 20 hole course.
Keep the feedback coming, I'm very open to suggestions and requests.
Regarding renaming holes, that's doable, but could be tedious. As changing the name for one means you'd have to change the names for all of the following holes. Do you see it happening in some other way? If it is tedious, do you think it would be be used? I suppose it might be worth it when you can duplicate saved games.
I'll see what I can do with the sizing for fewer than 6 players. I'm pretty much locked in height wise do to showing 9 holes, but the width could be flexible.
Someone emailed me requesting an option to track the number of putts per hole, would anyone else find this useful too?
It also sounds like defaulting pars to 3 for new games would be good. Any objections? I'm thinking it would pre fill the first 18 and the rest would be blank so you wouldn't have to remove a lot of pars for a 19 or 20 hole course.
Keep the feedback coming, I'm very open to suggestions and requests.