Marmoset
* Ace Member *
I think people over exaggerate how quickly DX breaks in.
The molds that were designed for DX plastic are great candidates for DX plastic. These are going to be most any disc designed before 2001. The PDGA Approved Discs list has a column for the approval date so that might be a good start on your "better in DX" list.
Putters and mids are fabulous in DX and I rarely ever throw them in any other plastic, except for Comets which do not come in Pro-D. The fairway drivers like the TB, GZ, Cyclone and EX are also fabulous in DX. The Valk is the fastest thing that I like to throw in DX. After that the disc geometries become to fragile for the characteristics of the DX blends. Occasional use is probably acceptable to my standards but a mainstay distance driver in my bag will probably not be a DX disc. After having said that I will say that I sometimes throw in a DX Wraith for pure distance in grassy fields with no possibility of tree-strikes.
Summary:
Give DX a chance in the older molds. They just might change your perception.
The molds that were designed for DX plastic are great candidates for DX plastic. These are going to be most any disc designed before 2001. The PDGA Approved Discs list has a column for the approval date so that might be a good start on your "better in DX" list.
Putters and mids are fabulous in DX and I rarely ever throw them in any other plastic, except for Comets which do not come in Pro-D. The fairway drivers like the TB, GZ, Cyclone and EX are also fabulous in DX. The Valk is the fastest thing that I like to throw in DX. After that the disc geometries become to fragile for the characteristics of the DX blends. Occasional use is probably acceptable to my standards but a mainstay distance driver in my bag will probably not be a DX disc. After having said that I will say that I sometimes throw in a DX Wraith for pure distance in grassy fields with no possibility of tree-strikes.
Summary:
Give DX a chance in the older molds. They just might change your perception.