I'm losing interest in this thread.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Playing with those who are better than you, will help you improve your game. You can more easily find those folks at leagues and tournaments.
I sympathize with a lot of this. COVID got a lot of people into new hobbies and not all of them "get it" yet. I find myself driving further out of the city to play courses that have fewer people on them and am enjoying myself more. The added drive time is more than compensated for by not having to wait on a group of 8 who want to pound Natty Daddys and smoke White Owls while waiting on the group of 10 ahead of them to finish up. Going further out has let me meet a ton of really nice people who pretty much just want to enjoy a walk, some nature and some peace and quiet as opposed to grumping my way through a round at the course down the street from me.old thread..but i feel this way now...my throws are fine consistent accurate long...and it is boring....i like playing...I find I like showing off and decided that was lame....i find alot of weird people, tattoed..pudgy..pulling carts high to be annoying..and i dont want to play with them or see them..i was obsessed with my destroyers...i am not anymore...I can play fine with almost anything...but am bored after 4 holes now and usualy go in....i go the skateparks instead...but same deal when the criowds come i go....i sound like a grump but i miss really liking disc golf and new discs
I am genuinely curious, is this proven to be true? How exactly would playing disc golf with better players improve your game?
In some activities like chess you can pick up valuable strategies from playing against better players. In other activities like basketball you cannot improve if you play against people that are far better than you, as you can't even get a shot off. Where does disc golf fit? I would guess if you somehow did a controlled study that there would be no appreciable difference.
The other thing to consider is the habit of winning or losing. If you consistently lose you can make it a habit, where losing is an acceptable outcome and you play down to your expectation. If you consistently win that winning becomes a habit and you tend to keep winning. I wonder how player ratings would change over time for a new player that jumped into open from the start or a new player that progressed through the AM divisions according to their rating. Would the open player internalize losing as a habit and stunt their own development?
In other activities like basketball you cannot improve if you play against people that are far better than you, as you can't even get a shot off.
I strongly disagree with this. Back when I was coaching AAU we would routinely play teams that where 15 or 16 years old when our team was only 12.
You will find out really quick which kids are going to step up and which one will fold because they can not get a shot off. More often than not the kids would step up.
You are only going to be as good as your competition.
Throw all rollers. :| We play roller doubles; every shot has to be a roller. You can putt, but one of you better hit metal or it's a penalty stroke. It's just an example; there are a lot of things you can do to change up a round if you want to add a challenge.My point is that I HAVE significantly improved and it has made the game less fun. I used to throw driver-driver, then sometimes make a 20 footer for par. And it was exciting. And now I'm throwing driver, then a stock approach shot and a drop in. For the same score. So there isn't really any possibility of a positive outcome. I get the expected outcome or I screw up.
One solution is to play different courses, and I'm trying to do more of that, but that isn't always a possibility due to time constraints.
My point is that I HAVE significantly improved and it has made the game less fun. I used to throw driver-driver, then sometimes make a 20 footer for par. And it was exciting. And now I'm throwing driver, then a stock approach shot and a drop in. For the same score. So there isn't really any possibility of a positive outcome. I get the expected outcome or I screw up.
One solution is to play different courses, and I'm trying to do more of that, but that isn't always a possibility due to time constraints.
. . . And now I'm throwing driver, then a stock approach shot and a drop in. For the same score. So there isn't really any possibility of a positive outcome. I get the expected outcome or I screw up.
Sounds like you need to play shorter tees.
I don't disagree with the premise, but I'm also not sure that playing with guys who are 15-20 years younger than me, 8 inches taller, and 80 lbs heavier is going to inherently give me an extra 100 feet of distance.
I get that, but it sounds like a mismatch between your current skill level and the course(s) you are playing. What about throwing just putters or mids to make the course back into a series of 2-shot holes?
Or longer tees. Whatever turns the hole into multiples of your reasonable throwing distance under the conditions usually makes it more interesting.
My point is that I HAVE significantly improved and it has made the game less fun. I used to throw driver-driver, then sometimes make a 20 footer for par. And it was exciting. And now I'm throwing driver, then a stock approach shot and a drop in. For the same score. So there isn't really any possibility of a positive outcome. I get the expected outcome or I screw up.
One solution is to play different courses, and I'm trying to do more of that, but that isn't always a possibility due to time constraints.
It isn't an issue of whether you can "step up" or not, it is an issue of whether you can reliably perform the actions you want to get better at. If you cannot get a shot off because your kids are getting blocked every time their shooting will not improve, I don't care how much gumption they have. I also suspect your anecdotal experience involves highly skilled 12 year olds; I doubt if you take the YMCA team with half the squad being first year players they will be playing against teams four years older than them and "stepping up" to the challenge. I also bet you had practices outside of these games against high school kids.
I find the notion of "only being as good as your competition" to be patently untrue. I agree you will not improve by beating on inferior players, you also won't improve by getting beaten on by vastly superior players. The ideal is to play within a reasonable skill level gap, where your players are challenged to win, but not challenged to perform even the basic requirements of the game.
So many things are like this. Once you know how it ends there's no mystery to it. All I know is take a pause and think about what pursuits have a long arc. I started disc golf in the early 80s and was very casual. When I went off to school, there was no park or place to play. I kept a few discs, but directed my need/enthusiasm for the outdoors into backpacking. That was good as there are all sorts of beautiful places you can't get to in a car. I've done that until I've become ragged, but I still love to get out. The last 15 years it has been a street dog that adopted me, so instead of backpacking, I would take her out on weekend hikes or beach—no 70 lb. packs. Now I come back around to disc golf. It's a nice walk, stretching, body mechanics—plus 40 years of disc/play evolution and the internet.
My point to this ramble is that it is being outside that is the thing. That's primal. Walking on a trail is primal and good for the head. Maybe you don't have to throw a plastic disc to get out. Maybe the constraints of a disc golf park are too limited. Try some weekend hikes. You've got trails, maps, a little food planning—stuff to do to get ready. Take some pictures. After a while you'll learn all the local trails in a 30 minute to hour area around where you live and that will get a bit boring. Maybe back to the disc golf then...
What I used to LOVE about disc golf was the proletariat vibe—no green fees! What I don't care much for now is the league play with the money and competition. It's kinda like the disc golf is a mechanism for small-time betting. Not my bag. Don't let it become an obligation, and don't give up the greatness of getting out. There's always a way until there isn't!
I am genuinely curious, is this proven to be true? How exactly would playing disc golf with better players improve your game?
In some activities like chess you can pick up valuable strategies from playing against better players. In other activities like basketball you cannot improve if you play against people that are far better than you, as you can't even get a shot off. Where does disc golf fit? I would guess if you somehow did a controlled study that there would be no appreciable difference.
The other thing to consider is the habit of winning or losing. If you consistently lose you can make it a habit, where losing is an acceptable outcome and you play down to your expectation. If you consistently win that winning becomes a habit and you tend to keep winning. I wonder how player ratings would change over time for a new player that jumped into open from the start or a new player that progressed through the AM divisions according to their rating. Would the open player internalize losing as a habit and stunt their own development?