are you saying the cores "could" weigh 30-40 grams, without the overmold?
I have pondered this for SO long. lol.
I have pondered this for SO long. lol.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Why don't you just unstaple the compass points and weigh a core?are you saying the cores "could" weigh 30-40 grams, without the overmold?
I have pondered this for SO long. lol.
I just cut the flight plates out and weighed the rims of 170g nova, 169g first run shock and 175g backdraft (traditional disc). The rim of the backdraft weighed 146g, the rim of the Nova weighed 154g and the rim of the shock weighed 160g.
Not a huge difference but a difference between an overmolded disc and non overmolded disc. (Disclaimer this was a crude method cutting with box knife.
I dug up a quote from the Q&A:
In our early days, we took an ultralight Wizard (~110g) and taped washers as weights to bring the overall disc weight to 175g. We did trials with mass taped in the very center, some with mass taped towards the outside, and weight distributions in between. The affect on flight from the weight distribution is very evident. The further you distribute mass away from the axis of rotation, the tighter the lateral movement of the disc. Although it was a primitive test, the principal still holds. We encourage everyone to try this experiment themselves.
Again kilgus, you're assuming many ratios without knowing the specifics of MVP's proprietary blends (exact polymers + weighting agents).
are you saying the cores "could" weigh 30-40 grams, without the overmold?
I have pondered this for SO long. lol.
Why don't you just unstaple the compass points and weigh a core?
opcorn:
I don't think anyone would take issue with you sharing truthful information about YOUR company, materials, or methods.I politely will bow out of this convo before it goes anywhere negative.
Again I've stated this previously. I digress and don't have to assume that it's a fact that classes of polymers and resins have a certain density they are made in no matter what brand is used which is what I was alluding to in previous post.
I politely will bow out of this convo before it goes anywhere negative. My answers have been based off of experience, none of it is empirical evidence for OM directly related to MVP.
I don't think anyone would take issue with you sharing truthful information about YOUR company, materials, or methods.
MVP runs TPE and TPU cores which is why you see the variance in weight. TPE can be found in densities from .9 to 1.2 (this will give you your weight differences) and all have a similar feel but don't have the same durability as their TPU brothers aka champion style plastic. MVP uses a rim that is a TPR/TPV which has a density of about 1.2-1.25 which is only a slight difference. I can't speak to how differently MVP discs fly (only thrown a few) but I do know the difference is minimal at best in terms of weight in the rim.
There's a massive, massive difference between 0.9 and 1.25g/mL.
There's a massive, massive difference between 0.9 and 1.25g/mL.
You do have to understand context...minimal difference between a 1.2 TPR rim and 1.14-1.2 TPU core....
Happy hucking
You said TPE in the quote. Now it's TPU?