THUGNIFICENT763
Banned
I'd like to see some other companies do direct rip offs of Gateway's original stamps and see what their reaction would be.
You mean like Reptilian's Lizard? Lol
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I'd like to see some other companies do direct rip offs of Gateway's original stamps and see what their reaction would be.
Your posts are losing a lot of cred lately. Wtf?
AVC: You never felt like burning CDs was stealing?
BF: Yeah, I've always been fine with it; I let people know that right up front. I feel bad for record companies now. No matter what kind of karma they had coming to them, I still feel bad about how they have to scrap to make a living, and how many of my friends have been laid off. [...] It's not a pretty place. But having said that, I also know how much I made from royalties from record sales alone. It's not very much. Most artists would be surprised at how much money they make from selling records. So the question becomes "Hundreds of thousands of people will listen to your music, but they'll be stealing it from your record company," and you say, "Well, what does that mean to me?" Nothing. Really, nothing. That aspect of my business didn't make that much, so I don't care. Metallica said that they care, and maybe they were making more off of record sales, I don't know. But all those artists who signed those petitions to stop people from stealing their music, well, maybe they should have checked to see how much they were making from royalties first. But it doesn't bother me, I'd rather have the hundreds of thousands of people hear my music. [Laughs.] To me, having a record company is the way you look famous and important, to let people know that you're sanctioned by "the man," and when you go play gigs, it's like "as seen on TV," that kind of thing. But I know that stealing music has been bad for people, I'm not going to say I'm happy for it, but it's not a bad thing for music. It's a bad thing for the music industry. And those two things are different.
You mean like Reptilian's Lizard? Lol
You mean like Reptilian's Lizard? Lol
Maybe you've been huffing the out-gassing of overmolds too much lately?
Making money off of art is a relatively new phenomenon and one that looks to be ending due in large part to internet piracy. Most of the world's art is probably the product of patronage and the term "starving artist" should ring a bell. All I'm saying is if you can make money off your art enjoy it while you can and while you're able to defend your IP in the courts. Even the best lawyers are powerless to prevent IP theft from the Chinese for example so it's a thing until it isn't. Don't confuse en vogue with conventional.
Ben Folds has spoken a bit about this stuff:
Did you copy and paste that?
Should probably credit the source....
Did you copy and paste that?
Should probably credit the source....
If you guys want Nike in the sport somebody just needs to start hot stamping big swooshes on their discs. It'd probably be cheaper for Nike to just outright buy gateway than to sick their legal team on them.
I don't understand why everybody's trying to copy gateways hot stamp. They wouldn't care less. What would do it would be Innova making an exact replica of the wizard mold, call it the Enchanter, and sell that. Then they may have an issue with it.