Guys (and gals) this is so clearly OB, I'm really not sure how it's even still a discussion.
The ONLY way the OP's lie is in, is if the TD (or in casual rounds, typical course rules) dictate that the white painted line on the pavement is inbounds (thereby making OB not "road and beyond" but "black asphalt and beyond")
If the course plays "road and beyond OB"...or even "road as a river" style this disc is OB. It is completely surrounded by the road.
I'm baffled (and worried) that this many people on here don't understand this rule.
Prerube the only disc that would be Out is the 3rd one by your clubs definition. Due to the vertical plane rule itself. Geometry would find that if there is a triangle created between the disc, the ground, and the corner of the vertical face of the curb at least some part of the disc would have to be in bounds. Otherwise #3 would happen, the disc would fall down and lay flat OB.
The ONLY way the OP's lie is in, is if the TD (or in casual rounds, typical course rules) dictate that the white painted line on the pavement is inbounds (thereby making OB not "road and beyond" but "black asphalt and beyond")
If the course plays "road and beyond OB"...or even "road as a river" style this disc is OB. It is completely surrounded by the road.
I'm baffled (and worried) that this many people on here don't understand this rule.
Here is our issue:
in the top picture the disc actually crosses the plane of the curb.
in the middle the disc is leaning on the curb that is used as the line
on the bottom the disc is touching the curb.
We play that all 3 are in, I do not agree fully, but I do not fight it.
Prerube the only disc that would be Out is the 3rd one by your clubs definition. Due to the vertical plane rule itself. Geometry would find that if there is a triangle created between the disc, the ground, and the corner of the vertical face of the curb at least some part of the disc would have to be in bounds. Otherwise #3 would happen, the disc would fall down and lay flat OB.