The disc is supported by the chain assembly under that scenario and is just as legal as a wedgie or anything else assuming that moving the chain/s would also move the disc.
-
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Does this shot count or not? I have $100 riding
- Thread starter GAMBLE
- Start date
The disc is supported by the chain assembly under that scenario and is just as legal as a wedgie or anything else assuming that moving the chain/s would also move the disc.
opcorn:$$$$
PDGA Rule 803.13.B. Disc Entrapment Devices: In order to hole out, the thrower must release the disc and it must come to rest supported by the chains or within one of the entrapment sections. This includes a disc wedged into or hanging from the lower entrapment section but excludes a disc resting on top of, or hanging outside of, the upper entrapment section. The disc must also remain within the chains or entrapment sections until removed.
--http://www.pdga.com/rules/80313-holing-out
This is the part that would make me call a leaner on top (touching a chain) as a made shot.
Frank Delicious
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2006
- Messages
- 16,244
Vegan Ray agrees with you here:
https://www.dgcoursereview.com/dgr/forums/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=18111
Also you throw the new sparkle Z Nuke-x yet?
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 4,072
Like I said...
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2008
- Messages
- 4,072
Frank Delicious
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2006
- Messages
- 16,244
If the basket was taken away would the disc still be supported?
Frank Delicious
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2006
- Messages
- 16,244
If I fell would you catch me EricJ?
Cgkdisc
.:Hall of Fame Member:.
It already "isn't good" so falling off wouldn't matter other than if it were at rest, it could get marked on the ground under that position rather than where it rolled.
The yellow disc was not touching a chain even though it looks like it might be due to the camera angle and the other disc suspended in the chains pushing the chain out.
The yellow disc was not touching a chain even though it looks like it might be due to the camera angle and the other disc suspended in the chains pushing the chain out.
What does this have to do with anything??????????????
We are assuming the disc was touching a link which, in that case, I would interpret the disc as "holed out".
Cgkdisc
.:Hall of Fame Member:.
Nope. It's sort of like a disc completely surrounded by concrete on an OB walkway and arguing that it's IB because a living blade of grass is bent over under your disc.
LeewayeDiscGolf
Double Eagle Member
It is also "sort of" nothing like that.
I in no way feel a disc on top should count but under the current rules I would be hard pressed not to consider it in. Once again I have never seen this happen but to me if it is touching a link it is more of a made putt than one sticking on the bottom of the basket.
ParkerJ152
Bogey Member
The PDGA just did an article on this, you can check it out here.
http://www.pdga.com/interference-rule
it's about half way down the page.
http://www.pdga.com/interference-rule
it's about half way down the page.
That picture dosen't do here justice. Here is a much better picture. She is 20 years old. Of course she has a boyfriend that I don't like, but what can I say, she loves him. Anyway, this is a better pic of her:
Similar threads
- Locked
