treehorn
Birdie Member
Well, no conspiracy to eliminate the jump putt or modify the stance rules....but they're up to something dagnabit
:hfive:
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Well, no conspiracy to eliminate the jump putt or modify the stance rules....but they're up to something dagnabit
I'm suggesting changing the rule about the supporting point to make the too close to call jump putts illegal and other follow troughs or falling putts legal. And that's only as a suggestion based on the assumption that the rule being too difficult to call in many situations is an actual problem. That may not, and apparnetly according to the PDGA so far, is not, a valid assumption.but i don't see how you'll be able to distinguish between a jump putt and a falling putt...since the rules are really specific around a static supporting point, not necessarily the action of jumping or lunging forward.
Apparently nothing if they aren't even considering the rule. It sounds to me like you're trying to run a smear campaign against the PDGA under the guise of a rule that was suggested on a message board but not actually submitted to the PDGA.My point still is regardless of this being a discussion or formal rules submission, is whatt is the core issue the pDGA is trying to solve?
The PDGA Rules Committee (RC) is trying to find a better way to handle the problem of calling jump putts legal or not. They have no agenda to either keep or get rid of jump putts, just solving the problem. It IS a problem based on high frame rate video where members of the RC tried to do jump and (Feldberg) walk thru putts legally. 'Yes' there are experienced jump putting pros in the RC. About 50% of the attempts were not legal where the disc was not released until the player was clearly off the ground much to the chagrin of some members who thought they were doing it legally.
So this discussion is relevant from the standpoint that ideas that might resolve the issue or handle it better might emerge. But so far, the RC feels the best candidate to improve the situation balancing the tradeoffs may be to increase the putting circle distance. But they're not willing to pull the trigger on that idea yet in the hope some other brainstorm may be better.
True. My point is this is the type of stuff your pDGA $ goes to...helping some non-jump putters level the competition because they lack skills. I know it probably won't pass...but the USDGC no strokes for OB rule passed, which is yet another major change in how the game is played.
I'm suggesting changing the rule about the supporting point to make the too close to call jump putts illegal and other follow troughs or falling putts legal...
I honestly think the "Feldberg walk through" put accomplishes the same thing, but with a more controllable, repeatable movement.
I've been looking for a video that clearly demonstrates this "Feldberg Walk Through" putt but can't find one. Any links?
I was looking for the video...but found this instead.
http://schoolofdiscgolf.com/2012/07/07/falling-putts-can-lower-your-score-2/
for those that feel this shouldn't be discussed...about 30-40% of respondents are FOR the proposal, the remaining are against. I'm also seeing similar thoughts on the pDGA board, so regardless if YOU feel this isn't an issue...there is a lot of disagreement on if jump putting should be legal or not.
A few of us seem to be in favor of just allowing jump-putts wherever.