I have been wandering around establishing my disc golf territory and at times I have this odd habit of going to parks without a course and plotting one out in my mind......wish I could post some of the course I have dreamed up. Other times I go to a course that really is poorly designed and underplayed and attempt to reconfigure and improve it...I go the extreme of getting my wheeled measurer out and plotting out holes etc...I am a bit of an obsessive nerd and have contacted a few property owners and parks etc but so far no love for me. Seems the places that want a course do not understand that a course can t be built in 2 acres around baseball fields and playgrounds and other bigger expanses just don t want to be bothered. I helped out building a great course but want more freedom to do as I please.....If I am going to do the work I like to have more say in where my labor is going. My question is this.....Would it be better to build a course in a place where there is a deadspot for disc golf and risk it being underplayed and misunderstood or would you rather add a course to a hotbed area where many of the courses often are too crowded. Seems there is a benefit to both and negatives to both. Some say there is a saturation point for disc golf...I don't believe beginner courses have as much value as prime courses because the people who play our sport on a regular basis prefer good courses...why build a course no one plays and then the park board says your an idiot no one plays this game, I think beginners still play tough courses anyway...I am rambling but again.....course in a barren DG region or course in a hotbed territiry?