Well, I watched the Waco final round live. Gave it a shot after giving up on the first round of the memorial.
It was O.K. rather boring. Nate was getting rather repetitive and the camera work hasn't gotten much better; oh look, Ricky takes a shot, lets focus on his back! What? we're supposed to follow the disc?
Live disc golf just isn't for me. But to be fair, it wasn't for me when Terry Miller was doing it either. I think it has a long way to go before it attracts anyone other than the hard core disc golfers.
Live disc golf as it is currently produced is only appealing to hardcore disc golfers. No one is going to casually happen upon DGPT or Smashboxx live coverage of disc golf and stay to watch it. If you don't already care, it's too slow and too poorly shot to grab your attention. Heck it's even hard for some of us who care quite a bit to sit through a live broadcast of disc golf as it is currently produced. Live coverage of DG has a long way to go. The current model (though it could be executed better: better camerawork, actually showing the disc, switching, etc.) is about the best that can be done with the resources currently available. The ideal live coverage model for disc golf looks more like ball golf coverage: lots of cutting from shot to shot. Not much video of people walking. I'm not sure disc golf will ever have enough money in it to justify that kind of coverage.
Post produced coverage currently has a higher appeal to a casual fan. The higher quality everything is much more pleasurable to the eyes. Live coverage is painful to watch. You have to strain the whole time just to see the darn disc. Good post produced is very digestible by comparison. A high quality one hour package is much easier to sell to people than a meh quality 3 and half hour package. If I'm going to show someone a disc golf video, there's no way in hell I'm showing them live coverage. I'd invite them to watch a Jomez or CCDG vid with me instead.