Lol at one region's woods not being as good as another's. That's just silly.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
BTW those are for NC style woods.....which I don't think is as nasty as some of the TX woods with undergrowth that "bites".
I play Kensington... a little over 10,000 feet. There are some long ones, but they still have tighter fairways, and a good amount of shots in the woods. One is not better than the other (Long open/tight woods) but the best courses have both.
Toboggan...10,000ft? IDK but maybe it is another course in the area
I play Kensington... a little over 10,000 feet. There are some long ones, but they still have tighter fairways, and a good amount of shots in the woods. One is not better than the other (Long open/tight woods) but the best courses have both.
I have a question. This was not my group but another.
This took place at Bradford. Hole 16 used a tee pad from the road. It was
one of the holes not played in the Carolina Clash (Worlds warmup). In the caddy book
it showed THE ORIGINAL TEE PAD NOT THE TEE PAD ON THE ROAD. Players were confused.
I know this was mentioned in the mandatory players meeting but still the caddy book
said play from the original tee not the tee from the road. A group was stroked for playing the
wrong tee pad and we (B pool) know now that other groups did in fact play the wrong tee pad
but were not stroked.
My question is: Once it was noticed in the caddy book that the wrong tee pad was listed
why didn't the worlds staff just stick to the original tee pad that was listed in the book? Was
it necessary to have the long tee pad (a whole 50 feet) and confuse the players? When I look
in an official caddy book and see it listed one way I will more than likely trust the CADDY BOOK.
Also being a TD myself of local tournaments in the Kentucky area when I have a change I am shouting this out while players are checking the scoreport. Something like "tee pad on hole 16 is on
the road - caddy book is wrong" I do these things loudly so people all over can hear. Seems kind
of rudimentary but then again people are in game mode and sometimes need these simple
wake up calls. No official was saying anything about this change.
Please don't take this as a complaint it is just a simple observation. I only want to make our
game better from an officiating standpoint. This is no knock on the club. CHARLOTTE RULES
DISC GOLF.
The question: why not just keep the original tee pad once it was noticed that the caddy book
had this error? What did making a hole 50 feet longer really accomplish?
Chuck?
We shouldn't emulate golf but we can use the logic of course design in reference to scoring separation and we should.
QUOTE]
bradford has open crushes as well. there are several wooded 270-330 holes however there are also holes that are out in the open like the 375 slightly uphill hole 11, Hole 8 which is a 710 ft par 4 where you can go for a 350 or 450 foot landing zone to set up your second shot hole 2 from the longs is a throw out of a mouth of trees and then a shot that is in an open field with a fast green and ob behind. this course has tight holes, it has open holes, it has semi open/tight holes, fast greens, water ob and elevation change. It is not just a bunch of flat shots in the woods.
The reason that the one group was stroked is they did it in front of the course marshall. Once we heard we immediatly fixed the problem by getting blue paint on the pad/road and puting sticks over the short pad. Hindsight is 20/20 and we should have been clearer.
That would be my video. Steve Brinster was supposed to be in the group & I was looking forward to shooting him but he had to bail out early because his wife was having a baby! Awesome Daddy to be!
Not silly. Trees and undergrowth varies a lot from region to region. It has drastic impact on hole design and playability.
Yes, silly. He's insinuating that the rough has to harm you (physically?) to be considered good design.
Yes, silly. He's insinuating that the rough has to harm you (physically?) to be considered good design.