John Hansen
Birdie Member
Vista is great for RHBH rollers. I roll all the time but I'm a old guy.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I don't hear many here who roll, especially at Vista. Must be an older guy thing.
Going back a few pages...I'd disagree that Paul struggled after or due to the break. He just about aced 15 immediately after play resumed. His drive on 16 was sawed off but that was it. He was CTP on 17 and by that point the storm was so bad nobody could do anything anyway.
Also, lefties play fine at vista and FH. But that's just IMO.
Anybody know what purple midrange/putter paul has at 19:51 round 3 of McFly's video? That is sick looking.
Anybody know what purple midrange/putter paul has at 19:51 round 3 of McFly's video? That is sick looking.
There were spotters on the drainage hole.
Holy cow, there are alot of videos from this tourney. Terry, Marty and DG Weekly have all posted several rounds worth of coverage. I know MurderMike was there. He's probably still editing. Lots of good stuff to watch.
I haven't seen any coverage of FPO. Paige played better than most of the men...until the final round.
What about that one spotter who would haul butt full on sprint to the the disc before it would even get there and have to jump out of the way. That guys was legit!
Depends entirely on your definition of what a "great" forehand is. If you're not capable of a 400 foot air shot with a forehand, you've got a very good one, potentially great accuracy - but overall greatness of the shot? It isn't a "great" forehand. Being able to get more air distance tends to equate to longer controlled distance. I think you need to be able to control a forehand out to 400 feet with accuracy on a golf line to be considered a "great" forehander. Which means far more than 400 feet of total potential air distance to be considered "great." I realize that this is a small subset of the disc population, but otherwise - you're kinda watering down the word "great."He has a great FH, 400 feet isn't needed to have a great FH though.
Depends entirely on your definition of what a "great" forehand is. If you're not capable of a 400 foot air shot with a forehand, you've got a very good one, potentially great accuracy - but overall greatness of the shot? It isn't a "great" forehand. Being able to get more air distance tends to equate to longer controlled distance. I think you need to be able to control a forehand out to 400 feet with accuracy on a golf line to be considered a "great" forehander. Which means far more than 400 feet of total potential air distance to be considered "great." I realize that this is a small subset of the disc population, but otherwise - you're kinda watering down the word "great."
Depends entirely on your definition of what a "great" forehand is. If you're not capable of a 400 foot air shot with a forehand, you've got a very good one, potentially great accuracy - but overall greatness of the shot? It isn't a "great" forehand. Being able to get more air distance tends to equate to longer controlled distance. I think you need to be able to control a forehand out to 400 feet with accuracy on a golf line to be considered a "great" forehander. Which means far more than 400 feet of total potential air distance to be considered "great." I realize that this is a small subset of the disc population, but otherwise - you're kinda watering down the word "great."