thedrew300
Eagle Member
Wiggins has the all around skills to dominate, I just don't think his mental game is there yet.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Even many of the 18 hole courses only have a few so really how many holes does it benefit a player to have that D over accuracy?
majority of courses are still this way. most 9 hole courses I can think of here, and that's a TON-- have no shots over 500' let alone even 450'. Even many of the 18 hole courses only have a few so really how many holes does it benefit a player to have that D over accuracy? Why doesn't avery Jenkins dominate or David Wiggins? They are not very accurate and struggle putting.
Alcuin,
Just for fun, what do you think you would score if you made 90% of putts within 30', and cleaned up your driving and approaching to near flawless accuracy. Even at your current distance. It's not out of the realm of possibility. How would your scores improve?
Toro, I was just asking him on a more personal level. Not that he'd be competing in Worlds.
Alcuin,
Just for fun, what do you think you would score if you made 90% of putts within 30', and cleaned up your driving and approaching to near flawless accuracy. Even at your current distance. It's not out of the realm of possibility. How would your scores improve?
1 and 2 at hiestand should be in your range.
I don't mean to pick on you AFTC, but this is something I've seen mentioned throughout this thread that doesn't make sense to me. I don't think you can develop huge d (450'+) without developing accuracy alongside it. With 400' of max d, you can still strongarm the disc to get there. But 450' consistently is a different story.