Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Just curious if Discraft makes a Distroyer, would there be any grounds for a lawsuit?
That is not what patents are for. Patents cover more or less "ideas".
MVPs fot exmaple covers a lot of cool 2 part molding stuff.:
https://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-bool.html&r=1&f=G&l=50&co1=AND&d=PTXT&s1="Mvp+disc+sports"&OS=
Brands/logos are generally trademarks. Art type stuff often falls into copywrite law.
Would be curious where a actual disc brand model falls into the legalese...
Just curious if Discraft makes a Distroyer, would there be any grounds for a lawsuit?
they already make one- it is called a force.
I spotted the 1000' hole (15 at the time) at Idlewild for a couple years for the Bluegrass Open. All the big arm pros threw proto Destros. The Discraft cannons threw Forces. They all wound up in a very tight grouping by the signs.
A common word may be registered as a trademark so long as it is not primarily the common name of the goods or services on which it is used. A term that is primarily the common name of the goods/services is "generic" and can never be a trademark. For example, while Shoes cannot be registered as a trademark for footwear, it might be registered for something unrelated, like software, because Shoes is not primarily a common name for software. It is not the fact that this is a common word that is a problem for trademark use but rather it is whether the common word is primarily a common name of the goods or services on which it is used.
Legacy makes the cannon.
Lol. I know what you meant. But can "cannon" be copyrighted, or does a "disc named cannon" have to be?
Here's a better question: Does the PDGA keep a model/drawing of each disc they approve so that it cannot just be copied by another manufacturer?
I think you missed the long list of specifics which would involve this patent. It is for a specific set of criteria. Not just ' a flying disc'
There was a story a year or two back about Jeff Homburg bringing a huge collection of tester discs to the PDGA center. I think up to that point, Homburg had them at his house.I would imagine they keep the prototypes they are sent. I doubt that keeps any given manufacturer from "knocking off" another though. The PDGA does its best to steer clear of any sort of legal shenanigans- that sort of thing would need to be sorted out in court.