Instead of such a rounded negative-vote number for disenfranchisement, why not a random one, maybe something like 3,593?
Looking at voting percentages troll.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Instead of such a rounded negative-vote number for disenfranchisement, why not a random one, maybe something like 3,593?
preserve with 3 drive by reviews in a day
eh... probably just a group of Udisc users that went to the course together
...smh
There needs to be a feature that keeps reviews locked until course pics are posted...
I loved White Birch in Hazelwood, MO., but I also know it's far from a 5 or a 4.
The course has a 2.68 average with only 3 reviews after 2015 and none of them are 4's or 5's. The last high review (4.5) was from 2012. I'm not sure what your gripe is.
Emmitsburg Community Park (clicky) has 3 straight 4.0 reviews from first-time reviewers. The only other review is a 2.0. :\
Fun little woodsy course with plenty of wildlife, but when I played there a few months ago it was a work in progress with maybe 3.0 to 3.5 potential. The Appalachian foothills make a lovely backdrop, but unfortunately the actual course is mostly flat and swampy in places.
I need to get back up there. Perhaps the improvements have been spectacular!
The course has a 2.68 average with only 3 reviews after 2015 and none of them are 4's or 5's. The last high review (4.5) was from 2012. I'm not sure what your gripe is.
Sorry for not clarifying. I meant to use White Birch as an example of a course that is fun, but not worthy of a high rating.
The course I am referencing in regards to local businesses/designers rating high is Clinton Hills in Swansea, which has a high review from Van Man Disc Golf. Gateway has done a few reviews in the past, but I don't think those were as obviously inflated.