dysmike
Double Eagle Member
But, in all seriousness, I am VERY happy I don't have to play in areas with snakes.
All you have to do is.. look before you reach.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
But, in all seriousness, I am VERY happy I don't have to play in areas with snakes.
Not to veer too far off subject, but I have some friends that went and played Fountain Hills this last year, and thought it was pretty boring.
Are rattlesnakes & scorpions a concern when playing courses in the south west? Those and high tick concentrations are definitely worth noting.
How about a list of every type of shot possible?
Looks like Texas has it all, including roaches big enough to eat small dogs
Sloppy writing on my part. Perhaps a better way to say it would have been to say a good course has diverse types of holes. Even if you had 18 tight technical holes each one well designed, IMO it's still not a good course. Within reason, fairways that trend both right and left, long holes that favor long drives. Short technical holes that require accuracy. Two part holes that require the player have a strategy to set up for the second drive. And again, holes that can't be beat by a throw other than what the designer specified. I understand that not every type of throw ever used can be created in a single course, but I also understand that a course that only has one or two feature types or is dominated by one type of play, is not a good course, no matter what the scores or setting. A good course IMO would have at least four major hole types, and each would be represented on the course in one hole where any player would think it was an exemplary hole.