Thunderbird hasn't even been out for a few years.
I'm pretty sure I added it to my bag in 2014. Maybe not, but I'm pretty sure this is the 3rd season in my bag...
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Thunderbird hasn't even been out for a few years.
I'm pretty sure I added it to my bag in 2014. Maybe not, but I'm pretty sure this is the 3rd season in my bag...
http://www.innovadiscs.com/disc/thunderbird/
Approved 8/4/2014
A few is defined as "a small number of." You haven't even owned yours for two. Technically I guess you're not entirely wrong since 1 is a very small number.
:thmbup: My exact thought before I even clicked on this thread
PDs will work better if you are a Teebird kind of player. OLFs will work better if you are an Eagle type of player. Thunderbirds will work better if you are a sheep.
Just curious, is there an ideal "platform" disc for cycling distance drivers in the slower speeds or are we left for individual discs for each shot?
it's tough to truly cycle speed 9/10 using just one plastic.
the SPD takes too long to season unless you play a lot, and the PPD isn't overstable enough to really bookend. this is a theme that repeats for all speed 9/10. you could start with a premium plastic that's pretty overstable . . . and never get it to be understable. 9/10 are best for pseudo-cycling unless you're tossing a dx firebird or a dx thunderbird and that's not really going to last long if you play courses primarily in the woods.
PD
/thread
Nate Doss has Predators that he cycles for his fairway slots.
Cycling predators isn't a normal thing. If they still made x predators, sure. But wearing in a z predator takes years. ESP will be faster but still not really good for cycling.
Exactly.PD is the best answer for one mold IMO, but really any 1.9 diameter is pretty much the same "platform"