It's definitely important to factor in that intangible sense of successful design. Though it's not a top 10 type of course, I'm always arguing for Pittsburgh's Knob Hill along these lines. On the surface it's a strictly par 3 course without a lot of pizzazz, and many of the holes are very straightforward. But, it all comes together incredibly well in terms of pacing, variety, and challenge. Many holes strike me as being archetypes, perfect expressions of a typical disc golf shot that elevate the course in hard-to-define ways. I've played a lot of courses along the lines of Knob Hill that seemed to me to be good not great. I struggle to articulate what makes Knob Hill differentiate itself as truly great, but I think it does do that. I try to trust my sense of that.