Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I think if another Company found out they were stamping their discs with Prodigy stamps they could file a lawsuit. They are misrepresenting the product.
Granted I know its just a stamp and with a disc with a tourney stamp you can't tell what mold it is immediately by looking at it, BUT i feel stamping one manufacturers disc with another manufacturers stamp is going too far and wish the PDGA would make some type of rule about that being illegal, just out of principle. I think if you want to have your own custom stamp made and have your discs stamped with that instead of inking them or whatever that is one thing (meeting the marking/indentifying requirement) but not crossing brands.
i think that would suck but i see why they would have to do it. they get paid by the company to use there products. that is what makes them a proffessional. they have to use the products. i think Feldberg now has to use only lat 64, westside and also dynamic discs.
Do we really have to resurrect this subject again? This has been rehashed so many times. All the outrage over what sponsored players throw kind of baffles me. Also, all the people saying, "Since x player doesn't throw all y brand, y brand must be crap." I think everyone knows that kind of talk is just silly, but it persists.
I mean, it would be hard for any player to convert from throwing all one company's discs to throwing all another's. We all have our favorite discs for different kinds of shots and everyone's favorites are different (and very few of us actually bag ALL one brand). If even one top player is throwing all Prodigy and winning tournaments then I think it should put to bed the rumor that those discs must be crap. So why the rehash again?