When I play a new course, I constantly struggle with deciding which tee to play from when multiple options are available. Originally I tried to play whichever tees were closer to a hole length average of ~293, since a mile per 18 holes seemed to fit my skill level. But this strategy soon wore thin as I felt like I was missing out on the optimal experience for courses that were designed with the longer tees in mind. Since I generally get to play a course only once when I'm traveling, making sure I play the "right tees" is a big deal. Here are my general criteria, a bit more evolved from my original:
1) Are any of the tees very clearly too easy or too hard for my ~850 skill level? Don't play those. (e.g. Ninigret Park reds)
2) Check the DGCR Scorebook to see if a certain tee is clearly more played than any other. Play that one. (e.g. Seviren Lang blacks)
3) When at the course, does any set of tees appear to be the "intended tee" to play from? For example, are the reds natural while the blues are concrete? I typically assume this means the designer gave the blues greater consideration and/or expected more players to use the blues. Therefore, I'll end up playing the blue tees. (e.g. IDGC - Steady Ed)
4) If all else fails, return to the mathematical 293 ft/hole approach.
The thread on disc golf superlatives mentioned Leviathan as being one of the more divisive courses in our game. This got me thinking on my tee selection dilemma, which was especially difficult at that course. The blacks seemed to be the intended tees (concrete), but were clearly beyond my skill level. However, the reds and the blues seemed to receive a comparable amount of play, and both were rubber. The blues fit my mathematical model, but I ultimately decided on the reds when I heard from multiple sources that the blues added little to the design of the course and served simply as extended reds. As a result, I enjoyed my round, but feel like I may have missed out on the best embodiment of the course.
Does anyone else dwell on these things, or am I just crazy? What are your criteria for deciding which tees to play?
1) Are any of the tees very clearly too easy or too hard for my ~850 skill level? Don't play those. (e.g. Ninigret Park reds)
2) Check the DGCR Scorebook to see if a certain tee is clearly more played than any other. Play that one. (e.g. Seviren Lang blacks)
3) When at the course, does any set of tees appear to be the "intended tee" to play from? For example, are the reds natural while the blues are concrete? I typically assume this means the designer gave the blues greater consideration and/or expected more players to use the blues. Therefore, I'll end up playing the blue tees. (e.g. IDGC - Steady Ed)
4) If all else fails, return to the mathematical 293 ft/hole approach.
The thread on disc golf superlatives mentioned Leviathan as being one of the more divisive courses in our game. This got me thinking on my tee selection dilemma, which was especially difficult at that course. The blacks seemed to be the intended tees (concrete), but were clearly beyond my skill level. However, the reds and the blues seemed to receive a comparable amount of play, and both were rubber. The blues fit my mathematical model, but I ultimately decided on the reds when I heard from multiple sources that the blues added little to the design of the course and served simply as extended reds. As a result, I enjoyed my round, but feel like I may have missed out on the best embodiment of the course.
Does anyone else dwell on these things, or am I just crazy? What are your criteria for deciding which tees to play?