runningDoc
Double Eagle Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2014
- Messages
- 1,599
The solution is simple - SSA is a better gauge than "par" to compare your score to in the grand scheme of things.
How close you shot to a scratch disc golfer's 1000+ rated past round is much more definitive.
Sometimes a wooded shorter course like Cranbury Park in CT the SSA is very close to par fifty four - 51 strokes, and sometimes Cedar Hill in TN a variable course that is long epic wooded, open, lots of major elevation changes and wind that is par 60 the SSA is still low 50's (52) because enough 1000 rated players shot those scores on that particular course.
Scoring using par is super useful from a quick mathematical sense though. From there you can compare par to what the SSA score is for further analysis.
How close you shot to a scratch disc golfer's 1000+ rated past round is much more definitive.
Sometimes a wooded shorter course like Cranbury Park in CT the SSA is very close to par fifty four - 51 strokes, and sometimes Cedar Hill in TN a variable course that is long epic wooded, open, lots of major elevation changes and wind that is par 60 the SSA is still low 50's (52) because enough 1000 rated players shot those scores on that particular course.
Scoring using par is super useful from a quick mathematical sense though. From there you can compare par to what the SSA score is for further analysis.