oldmandiscer
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2020
- Messages
- 1,718
Sarcastic snark = "real observation" when you troll online all day.
So all birdies and eagles with an occasional par is tough?
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Sarcastic snark = "real observation" when you troll online all day.
So all birdies and eagles with an occasional par is tough?
Looks like another 1030s for Brodie
Didn't he start playing last year or is it two years now.
We're in here talking about par is for sponsorship. I mean, listen, we're talking about par. Not a game. Not a game. Not a game. We're talking about par and sponsorship. Not a game.If it was my company name on a course, I sure wouldn't want one where par was so soft.
For MPO par was too high on holes #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, and #16. Total par should have been 55.
For FPO, par was too high on holes #8, #10, #13, and #17, but too low on #15. Total par should have been 65.
If it was my company name on a course, I sure wouldn't want one where par was so soft.
For MPO par was too high on holes #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, and #16. Total par should have been 55.
For FPO, par was too high on holes #8, #10, #13, and #17, but too low on #15. Total par should have been 65.
If it was my company name on a course, I sure wouldn't want one where par was so soft.
For MPO par was too high on holes #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, and #16. Total par should have been 55.
For FPO, par was too high on holes #8, #10, #13, and #17, but too low on #15. Total par should have been 65.
If it was my company name on a course, I sure wouldn't want one where par was so soft.
For MPO par was too high on holes #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, and #16. Total par should have been 55.
For FPO, par was too high on holes #8, #10, #13, and #17, but too low on #15. Total par should have been 65.
If it was my company name on a course, I sure wouldn't want one where par was so soft.
For MPO par was too high on holes #3, #5, #6, #7, #9, #10, and #16. Total par should have been 55.
For FPO, par was too high on holes #8, #10, #13, and #17, but too low on #15. Total par should have been 65.
it's hard to set par when the course is designed without aiming for par. 3, 5, 6, 9, and 10 (MPO) are simply too easy. Too many pros can throw a shot (or two) that distance within their confidence range for putting with the lack of obstacles. Instead of designing holes that average 2.2 or 3.2 and rounding up, design them at 2.8 and round up (or better yet, 3.2 and round down).