amenities can add to a rating but never are they neccesary
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
Looking at the Top 10 list, we still have the issue of apples to oranges in the form of golds to blues. Flip, Blueberry, BRP and Deer Lakes are blue level courses. FlyBoy, Hornings, Idlewild and HB Gold are gold level courses. I don't know the other two. I listed them in descending order as they are rated so far within their blue or gold category. My order for the four courses in each category wouldn't be the same but I also wouldn't have them merged on the same list either if I had my druthers.
I often see complaints about tee pads being to short or too narrow. No distances or tee signs. Once you are off the tee you don't have the luxury of distances or proper footing. That sort of stuff has no actual bearing on whether a course is good or not. And bag holders? Does anyone really want to lift their bag up and hang it on every hole? Just not important.
Amenities is anything that is not "design" if you only use two categories of rating elements. So I'd say they are needed. Hard to imagine a 5 disc course with a 5-disc design and 0 for amenties (no signs, tee pads, benches, maintenance).amenities can add to a rating but never are they neccesary
As the OP indicated, a course should have everything to meet the 5 disc standard. Normal accessibility is a basic element of that which is in the Amenities category. A design might be a 5 (even though it's not yet at FlyBoy) but the lack of some amenities moves it down from a 5.
I often see complaints about tee pads being to short or too narrow. No distances or tee signs. Once you are off the tee you don't have the luxury of distances or proper footing. That sort of stuff has no actual bearing on whether a course is good or not. And bag holders? Does anyone really want to lift their bag up and hang it on every hole? Just not important.
I always answer the question "did you find this review helpful" with a "no" if the clown reviewer whines or complains about tee signs, tee pads, distances or bag holders.
amenities can add to a rating but never are they neccesary
What is interesting is how some of the gimmicks seen at Highbridge, Hippodrome, and Flyboy are seen as innovative design concepts but in other threads any hint of creativity is crushed.
really? that's very lame, to be honest a ignorant statement like this makes me want to go give you a thumbs down on every single review you have. good or not, cause i think people who give others a thumb down because the reviewer didn't like the crappy tee signs cause they had to walk every fairway to find the hole or because teepads were so crappy they were concerned about potential injury. see how dumb your logic is?
the only way i give a thumbs down for anybody is if its a "this course rocked" or the "this course sux" reviews. if they put any effort into the review whether i liked it or not i don't leave any feedback. and the only way i give a thumbs up is if it was a stellar review.
What some would call Gimmicks at Flyboy
1600 foot hole
Roller Basket
basket in deadfall
Others consider Innovative
500 foot wide open holes are usually unimaginative/lazy, so does that mean a 1600 foot wide open hole is 3 times as much?
This is a list of courses rated by certain reviewers as being better than flip city.....these courses are rated by some dgcr members as being superior to #1 Flip City
Shore Acres Park
Iowa State University (Stable Run DGC)
Blue Ribbon Pines
Horning's Hideout - Canyon Course
Highbridge Hills - Blueberry Hill/Granite Ridge/Gold
Castle Hayne
Renny-NC
Golden Gate-SF
FDR-NY
Charlie Vettiner
East Roswell
Lake Olmstead
Leviathan
Hippodrome
Rogers Lakewood
Steady ED
Yadkin
Lincoln Ridge
Winter Park
Campton Hills
Fox Chase
Foothills
Dretzka
Lemon Lake Silver
Ashe County Park
Brown Deer
Boyne Mountain
Holler In the Hills
I don't know much about those courses but it just goes to show you how much opinions are different on this site and the consensus holds some merit. But in the end your own opinion is what counts and justifying your reasoning is whats it s all about
If I want amenities I go to the mall.....when I wanna disc golf I go to the woods
Ahhh but we have stated several times that the hole is only 94 feet wide...is that wide open to you? Most people would consider that a tunnel shot given the distance.
Personally I feel it was an easy and cool way to get from one side of the course to the other and utilize what is probably the biggest man-made geographical feature of the land.