kerplunk
Double Eagle Member
I am a mindless zombie....I'll count what I'm allowed to count.....
Thanks for the honesty
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
I am a mindless zombie....I'll count what I'm allowed to count.....
BTW, I was providing a history lesson not agreeing with the current practice one way or the other. If I could wave a magic wand, discs wouldn't be able to stick in the sides of baskets so we wouldn't even need a discussion about whether shots on top should count.Rules change as sports evolve. It used to be illegal for the puck to come off of the ice in hockey. Women used to play basketball half court. Forward passes used to not be allowed in football. Doing things based on tradition probably causes more harm than good in this world, yet is looked upon as honorable.
It would make life simpler if it did count but it would go against the history of our game. When the basket was designed, it was a representation of the original target which was a tree with two bands of tape wrapped around it. If your disc hit the tape or between the tape, you had holed out.
If we really wanted to make the sport more challenging, we would eliminate the chain support completely and just have an open basket for holing out like an elevated ball golf hole. Then wedgies could count and there wouldn't be any such thing as DROT because a disc coming down from a steep angle would either have gone in or just missed.
That's what triggered the invention of the basket - to eliminate arguments about hitting the target or not. If the sport was invented more recently, perhaps we might have pole targets with sensors in them that would light if a disc touched them. Then, just like the Clapper device on TV, a player would clap loudly to reset the sensor light to wait for the next player's throw.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cgkdisc
It would make life simpler if it did count but it would go against the history of our game. When the basket was designed, it was a representation of the original target which was a tree with two bands of tape wrapped around it. If your disc hit the tape or between the tape, you had holed out.
I've always wondered how well this actually worked. It seems like any time you were further than 20ft away it could be contentious whether it hit the tape or just above or below.
top of the basket is another preposition altogether now.
I guess I am in the minority on this one, because I have had my disc land on top of the basket twice. It rarely happens, so that is why I don't think it would be that big of a deal if it counted.
There should be a compromise, The basket should have an opening at the top. The ring on top will still support the chains, but if there was an opening on the top a disc that hits just right would sink into the chains and be counted. Not deep, just deep enough that if the disc falls jusat right it will stick in like one or two inches and count. Anyone aiming for the top would still be subject to hitting the rim and bouncing off, this would just allow for a second option if you hit the top perfectly.