brutalbrutus
* Ace Member *
Clubs already did the Roc Vs Buzzz events.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
No manufacturer would ever allow this. Marketing nightmare for the ones that lose.
Ah, but what Conrad threw was not in that competition.Clubs already did the Roc Vs Buzzz events.
Zero interest in a manufacturer based team tournament and don't see what purpose it'd serve.
Who wins in said hypothetical match?
Not changing sponsors but pretty big news for FPO:
Great news! Latitude 64 and Kristin Tattar has signed a four-year-deal. This deal is worth half a million dollars, which makes Kristin Tattar one of the best paid disc golfers in the world. "And rightfully so. Latitude 64 and all the crew here are excited about this extended cooperation", says Latitude 64 CEO David Berglund.
Not changing sponsors but pretty big news for FPO:
Great news! Latitude 64 and Kristin Tattar has signed a four-year-deal. This deal is worth half a million dollars, which makes Kristin Tattar one of the best paid disc golfers in the world. "And rightfully so. Latitude 64 and all the crew here are excited about this extended cooperation", says Latitude 64 CEO David Berglund.
Zero interest in a manufacturer based team tournament and don't see what purpose it'd serve.
This is a good move for them. After her US run this year a ton of local players both male and female have started using her sig Pure a ton. The mix of performance and marketability is solid.
I could be wrong, but I can't recall a ton of male players using a disc primarily because of an FPO players success. JK valks maybe?
I'd say there is room for debate. Ultimately it's about being able to shape the shot and put the disc where you want it.
Generically, more techniques = better, but if you are more dialed with fewer options it may balance out.
I mean - sure. If you either a) don't put in the time practicing or b) you're bad at developing practice routines. If one of those options is true of any given pro - utilizing a minimalist approach on the course is a good idea for your performance. But, given that these players are out there on tour throughout the year ostensibly focused on their disc golf careers: there is no reason to not be wholly dialed with both the backhand and the forehand option, outside of personal physical or mental limitations.Exactly.
That's the same discussion as with more or less discs/molds. Some argue that more repetitions with the same discs/molds/BH is better than having a seemingly more suitable disc/mold/technique for the shot. Some see it the same. -- Eventually, I'd say, it comes down to playing the game the way that suites you best because that way you'll have the most fun and confidence and therefore success.
If Drew's grinning each time when others throw drivers and he throws his orange Buzzz, then that might make him happy and play well. Or maybe he simply likes watching smooth backhand shots more than sidearms. I don't know. It doesn't matter what it is that makes you play better -- that can be a different things for different people.
I highly doubt these guys are actually making millions of dollars. A 10 year contract at $100k per year is a million dollar contract, even if the second half is unprotected and the bulk is performance spiffs.
A stand alone event would likely be a logistical nightmare. A lot of companies each interested in making their brands look good... but maybe a Formula1 style Manufacturers Championship could work?
For instance, at each event you would take the top3-5 finishers from each brand and award points based on how they finished in relation to each other. Then at the season's end, a "winner" would be awarded...
There really isn't incentive for the brands themselves but maybe something we do for fan bragging rights.
But how does this prove anything? .... i just don't quite understand it.
Headwinds - I'd much rather throw an overstable disc into a headwind than try to execute a touch shot with a flippy disc. While Drew is orders of magnitude better than me, I think the above would hold true for basically anyone.
But how does this prove anything? Say Discraft "won". Does that mean they are the best manufacturer or have the best players? I understand being a fan of players but not how their play effects how I feel about a company. I love certain players for different reasons and it has little to do with who their sponsors are. Likewise, I throw discs that are also thrown by players I don't like, but those are the best for me. I know there certainly are company "fanboys" who only want players sponsored by certain companies to win, i just don't quite understand it.
so many buzzkills
we already have a bajillion events that are all essentially all the exact same format/scoring/faces etc other than location.
I for one wish we had more pro events that try something different.