Yeah, I can roll with it when someone goes "I can feel the difference between a Luna and a Roach"; OK, I'll give you that. If you say a Luna feels nothing like a Roach (or by extension an Aviar) there is some cognitive dissonance going on there to justify your really expensive putter habit.
To be clear, everybody gets to spend their money so if Lunas are what you want to throw by all means do it. The '22 TS ones are really pretty, so why not. Right? It's just...it's just not a unique golf disc. It's an Aviar variant.
So go back to what I was saying about getting into the game...if I was some super-skilled 1000 rated guy, I could probably describe some minuscule flight differences I consistently saw between Lunas and Roaches and Aviars. I'm not a super-skilled 1000 rated guy, I'm lucky if I can get the same disc to flight the same way twice. :\ Which is how beginners are. So since they (and I) are going to throw their putter all over the place anyway, why get hung up on subtle differences? Aviar PandA's are inexpensive and you can get them everywhere. Just throw those. If later on you decide disc golf has stuck and you are going to play a lot, geek out on putters and try a Luna then if you want. If you decide you are a Luna guy at that point, knock yourself out. It's all good.
We just end up making a big deal out of a little bit sometimes. I actually throw Classic Aviars when I throw Aviars; they are advertised to have less fade than a PandA. OK. At my skill level? Yeah, it's the same disc. I throw Classic Aviars because I like the stamp. :| I COULD blow smoke about how they are straighter and it's a big difference yada yada yada...I like stiffer plastic and I like the old-school stamp. I can swap them for PandA's and throw exactly the same, though. Any actual debatable difference in how they feel and fly is in my head.