brutalbrutus
* Ace Member *
Terry is currently live streaming on his YT channel day1 recap from USDGC...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NMdGNXKmpo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5NMdGNXKmpo
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
The new holes 3 and 4 were hardly birdied compared to the old holes 1 and 2 that were replaced, meaning the common -2 for those holes was replaced by par as the likely common score on the new ones.
Can that (the lack of birdies) be chalked up to it being the first time the holes were played in competition? Obviously everyone had a chance to practice them and develop a strategy, but doing it in the pressure-free practice environment and when the bright lights are on are two different things. With more collective experience, I would expect scores to come down a bit overall as the weekend progresses.
Essentially what I'm asking is how much stock should we put in those numbers as being indicative of what to expect going forward? We had years and years of data on the old holes, and only one round's worth on the new ones. Is it enough to draw meaningful conclusions?
If they used a single mando (moved the first mando another two sets of trees to hole) it would be balance the risk/reward more.
If they used a single mando (moved the first mando another two sets of trees to hole) it would be balance the risk/reward more.
Nah, old 1 and 2 were holes even Ams are thinking are birdies. The new hole 3 requires 600' on the right turnover or roller angle to get a decent angle at hitting the gap for a 3. And hole 4 has all of the risk and none of the reward that typically makes USDGC holes so effective. If they used a single mando (moved the first mando another two sets of trees to hole) it would be balance the risk/reward more.
I wondered about the thought process behind 2 mandos rather than just one.
I wondered about the thought process behind 2 mandos rather than just one.
Agreed, the 2 new holes just arent good imo. The oddly placed mandos on 3 and 4 are just gimmicky to me and take the course down a notch for sure.
Watching players either putt up to a mando or putt through one is not really my cup of tea. Neither is the triple island hole.
Agreed, the 2 new holes just arent good imo. The oddly placed mandos on 3 and 4 are just gimmicky to me and take the course down a notch for sure.