Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
In sports like darts, cornhole, billiards where player size and physical strength are not as important you would think that women should be equal to men. In reality they are not. I would bet that the top 20 players in world in darts, cornhole, billiards (and 20 foot DG putts) are all men.
The question is: why are men better at sports where size and strength are not important?
I think an argument could be made for any of these sports/games that strength, or more specifically power, still matter.
Darts - a more powerful throw covers the distance to the board more quickly, and therefore falls less due to gravity. This allows a more powerful player to throw a "frozen rope" where a less powerful player has to play more of an arc.
Cornhole - Similar to darts except opposite. More power allows for more options when determining the angle which one wants to drop onto the board.
Billiards - More power opens up more opportunity for placement shots. If you can put some nasty spin on a ball and still have enough power to pocket the desired target ball, you have an advantage.
I think it probably has to do more with societal factors. Men are often taught to be more competitive than women.
One wonders if someone like Serena Williams took up disc golf (even at her age) tomorrow, and spent 3-4 hours a day on it, if she would be top 5 in the world by summer..
So, perhaps elevating all baskets and removing their chain assemblies might level the putting field?Not exactly apples to apples...
https://www.sbs.com.au/topics/sport/article/2019/01/24/women-are-better-men-free-throw-line
Did Paige's father have a 78-page plan written before she was born on how to make her the best disc golfer in the world? Probably not.
I didn't say she missed the mando, I watched it already, I'd like a link to the highlighted that allows you to take it as far back as Jen did. Here are the relevant sections on OB and relief from obstacles.
I was referencing the fact that what she appears to have done is:
- Gone OB
- Taken her meter in from the OB line (in any direction in-bounds)
- Taken optional relief back on the line of play (straight back from the target)
All of these options were available last year, but what would have been different is since she had not passed the mandatory object, it would have been the target that her line of play was on. With the new rules the line of play is always straight towards the basket or object that you use to "hole out", never towards any mandatory object.
If this had been last year her line of play would have given her a worse angle and she would not have been able to take relief as far back before running into OB.
Now, if there's a new rule that allows you to take relief back indefinitely along an OB line then that's probably just what she did, but I didn't find it (and it would be a terrible rule).
She did not miss the mando. She was simply OB. New rule allows you to take the disc IB further down the OB line. She definitely did NOT take here lie in a direct line from the basked, just further from the basket and then took her meter relief from the OB line.
Sharp play by Allen and unfortunate that Henna was likely not up on the new rule.
RE: women and putting--I wonder how much of it is simply practice time/interest? One can look at the FPO field in any event, even DGPT events, and see the talent level drop off fairly quickly, and often there are not even 40 entrants. For whatever reasons, the sport has not been that attractive to women, and coupled with (again up until now anyway) lower purses overall, there just may not be enough women playing and competing against each other at all levels to force monthly improvement. In other words, only a select few are spending the requisite time on putting for that muscle memory to really take effect. One wonders if someone like Serena Williams took up disc golf (even at her age) tomorrow, and spent 3-4 hours a day on it, if she would be top 5 in the world by summer.
Not sure if anyone tracks this, but I would be curious if the percentage of women vs men getting PDGA numbers has changed any since the pandemic.
Or maybe I am way off, and many players DO spend hours every day on their game, and something else is at play. I do wonder if muscle memory pathways in women work differently than in men? That could explain putting slumps anyway. If someone does not have that memory to fall back on, they have to think about every putt. The brain is the last thing we want working overtime on the green...
New rule allows relief along "line of play" which is determined after the lie is established. Taking relief along the OB line would be a misplay. JA's lie looks questionable; however, the camera angles don't allow an accurate interpretation. The Caddy Book map shows this could be legit. The relief was so far and offered such a significant advantage that I'd think the group discussed it- AFTER HB threw.
New rule allows relief along "line of play" which is determined after the lie is established. Taking relief along the OB line would be a misplay. JA's lie looks questionable; however, the camera angles don't allow an accurate interpretation. The Caddy Book map shows this could be legit. The relief was so far and offered such a significant advantage that I'd think the group discussed it- AFTER HB threw.
More correctly throwing for the first time from an incorrect lie is a Marking the Wrong Lie warning (802.06 D).
You quoted the situation you said you couldn't find and said was a terrible rule…points D and E.
She took optional relief further away and did not receive the penalty strike normally associated with doing so because she was already taking a penalty stroke for going OB.
New rule allows relief along "line of play" which is determined after the lie is established. Taking relief along the OB line would be a misplay. JA's lie looks questionable; however, the camera angles don't allow an accurate interpretation. The Caddy Book map shows this could be legit. The relief was so far and offered such a significant advantage that I'd think the group discussed it- AFTER HB threw.
Since the mando does not come into play, the relief would indeed be along the line of play, from the basket, not the mando.