I have yet to ever find a putter that "sucks" at putting.. RIP discs, ching juju, innova birdie, floppy putters from DGA-- they all work.
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
The Ion can't turn right just a little (rhbh), nor can it really go straight (assuming a clean throw) on shorter shots. It's just not as versatile under 250'. Just to reiterate I do like Ions and I understand why some prefer them.
Not sure I agree with this from my perspective. My old early run Ion (with the mismolded bead) can definitely turn right just a little and go straight and my well worn Proton Ion (transparent "candy" plastic) is arguably too straight since it's supposed to be the overstable complement to the other Ion. They both seem easier to do those lines than my Anodes did.
Maybe the hiccup is from the fact that even on shorter holes I throw them pretty hard (not farther; you assuredly throw farther/better than I do probably) rather than trying to finesse and glide them to the basket like you would a traditional putter. Even still, the Anodes seemed more nose angle sensitive and made throwing that way a little trickier than Ions to me as well.
Edit: I've still yet to try any neutron versions of either though.
I have yet to ever find a putter that "sucks" at putting.. RIP discs, ching juju, innova birdie, floppy putters from DGA-- they all work.
I was only talking about Ions that you can buy at the store today. Early Ions were a different animal altogether. The Anode is definitely more nose angle sensitive and I use that to my advantage...Though I throw the Anode for 2/3 of my golf strokes so that grants me a certain familiarity.
They all work, but not all putters are created equally. I experience far more cut-throughs and pole bounces with premium plastic putters, which Ions and Anodes are, than any other.