oldmandiscer
Banned
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2020
- Messages
- 1,718
This topic primarily applies to PDGA pro events but some courses as well when making artificial hazards and OB.
I grew up playing mostly golf with disc golf being more of a hobby. In golf hazards exist where you have an option to either play it where it lies or with a shot penalty move to where it last crossed into the hazard.
OB is a shot which lands not on the golf course or property. Like someones backyard. That incurs a shot penalty and a re-tee or shot (which I actually disagree with it should be played where it went OB imo but I digress).
I think that disc golf currently has it wrong with pro course setups and the rules themselves. We have way to much OB where players are throwing it one place then playing from another. I grew up with the play it where it lies.
It doesn't make sense to me logically to throw it in the woods, take it out of the woods and place it on the fairway. What is the point of doing this? Just to add strokes to the final outcome? Because in a way they are making it easier by being able to place a shot on the fairway but adding a stroke for it.
Nor having artificial OB just behind the basket where two players throw long, one player 12 feet from the basket but 1 inch OB, next player 50 feet long and 38 feet OB. Both players place it 9 feet from the basket and tap in taking the same score. It doesn't make sense. Why are we always moving from one area and playing from another? It's gimmicky and illogical.
So what I think should be changed is that areas should be marked hazard and the player has the option to play it where it lies or move from the hazard with a one stroke penalty. Playing where it last crossed.
I understand why course TD's make areas OB that are thick as you can lose a disc easily. Hazard solves this by allowing the player an option to find it, either play it from where he found it or play where it last crossed with penalty.
Do you agree that the rules need to be modified and designers allowed better options such as a new hazard rule?
I grew up playing mostly golf with disc golf being more of a hobby. In golf hazards exist where you have an option to either play it where it lies or with a shot penalty move to where it last crossed into the hazard.
OB is a shot which lands not on the golf course or property. Like someones backyard. That incurs a shot penalty and a re-tee or shot (which I actually disagree with it should be played where it went OB imo but I digress).
I think that disc golf currently has it wrong with pro course setups and the rules themselves. We have way to much OB where players are throwing it one place then playing from another. I grew up with the play it where it lies.
It doesn't make sense to me logically to throw it in the woods, take it out of the woods and place it on the fairway. What is the point of doing this? Just to add strokes to the final outcome? Because in a way they are making it easier by being able to place a shot on the fairway but adding a stroke for it.
Nor having artificial OB just behind the basket where two players throw long, one player 12 feet from the basket but 1 inch OB, next player 50 feet long and 38 feet OB. Both players place it 9 feet from the basket and tap in taking the same score. It doesn't make sense. Why are we always moving from one area and playing from another? It's gimmicky and illogical.
So what I think should be changed is that areas should be marked hazard and the player has the option to play it where it lies or move from the hazard with a one stroke penalty. Playing where it last crossed.
I understand why course TD's make areas OB that are thick as you can lose a disc easily. Hazard solves this by allowing the player an option to find it, either play it from where he found it or play where it last crossed with penalty.
Do you agree that the rules need to be modified and designers allowed better options such as a new hazard rule?