I almost made a similar statement.
I think there's a case to be made that when a championships won via a dominant performance, (e.g. Super Bowl blowout, or a best of 7 series that doesn't go more than 5 games), basically take luck out of the equation. Those aren't won because one party gets all the breaks, and the other party gets none.
I'd say a golf or disc golf tournament won by 5 strokes or so isn't about luck. It would take more than luck for 2nd place to bridge that gap.
Over the course of an event with more rounds (or multiple games in the case of a series) performance becomes much more important than luck.
But the thing is, participants have to play damned good to put themselves in position to get lucky. No doubt in my mind, Conrad's track record indicates he's more capable of making that kind of finesse turnover shot than any other touring pro today.