corin_brown
Eagle Member
I don't know what to tell you, but the TD doesn't have the leeway to make a judgement call like that. By rule, he has to allow the player to play, no matter who he has along with him. There was already a post early on quoting rules committee members discussing such a situation. Their conclusion was that the guy can play, but he's subject to any rules violations calls the group feels they have to make about the child.
So the TD's responsibility, IMO, is let the guy play if he wants but make it unquestionably clear that he is opening himself up to courtesy violations and more (DQ is certainly on the table if things escalate) if the kid becomes an issue. If the guy accepts that, so be it. If not, he can walk away. What the player can't really do is cry foul if other players see fit to call violations on the kid when appropriate.
As the TD, I'd also make it a point to speak with the players who will be grouped with the Dad and his kid and make it clear to them that if there are any issues, they shouldn't hesitate to call courtesy violations and assess penalties if necessary. They're being put in a bad spot, so they should know from the start that they have recourse. Not knowing or understanding that they have the power to warn and penalize players is probably what led to no one saying a word during the round(s) that prompted the OP to start this thread.
That all makes sense to me. I'd be curious to see what a real hard-ass TD like Jussi would do or say in this scenario. I bet he'd bounce that player and their baby like like they were trying to crash a state dinner at the White House.