I'd like to discuss and compare the East Coast Wooded Monsters. I hear the comparisons being made to Iron Hill, Nockamixon, Quaker's Challenge, Nevin, Tyler, French Creek, Patapsco, Renny and Hornets Nest. I've played them all and feel this type of golf is the truest test of power and skill. Each offers it's own take on long wooded holes that can be devastating to scores if your only slightly off your game.
These courses are all linked together in the type of golf it offers, but I think the differences are often over looked. I would like to take the time to discuss the pros and cons of each of these courses.
First is Iron Hill. It's the course I know the best. I'll stick to the Gold layout as it's what the course was built to be. The tee pads and signs are second to none. The SSA is 72 and can frustrate any touring pro. The course has few if any gimmicks. No mandos, no strung out OB. The course can be played in it's Gold tournament layout at any time. No easy deuce holes. The shortest hole is 360'. Tough hole after tough hole from start to finish. 16, 17 and 18 may be the hardest finishing holes in Disc Golf. All the things I mentioned here can also be the draw back. It's tunnel shot after tunnel shot. There's no epic scenery. Unless your playing well and are truly seeing all your lines the holes can begin to run together.
Nockamixon may be the prettiest and most original of the wooded monsters. With the huge rock beds on numerous holes and overlooking a marina on others, it by far is more appealing to the eye then Iron Hill. It also offers more variety of shots. With an OB stream on numerous holes and less defined fair ways the luck factor is a little higher then I care for. That's up to debate. The true flaws come in the tee pads and signs. I've heard there are plans to install concrete tee pads. This is my second favorite. If I could combine Iron Hill and Nockamixon, I'd probably never play anywhere else.
Quakers Challenge is one of the most underrated courses I have ever played. Very tough course with great tee pads. Elevation is used to really make simple holes true test. Each birdie is earned. No gimme holes on the hole course. There are a couple of shorter holes with extremely tight fairways. Much like Iron Hill no epic scenery.
I only got to play Nevin once. It was less then a year old back in the fall of 2010. It impressed me very much. Nice use of elevation and hole after hole was a real challenge. I was really disappointed we didn't get to play it at the 2012 Worlds. Even though I loved the course, once again much like Iron Hill no epic scenery or any open holes that I remember.
French Creek was redesigned a few years ago from 2 18 hole courses to a 18 hole monster. One of the hardest layouts any where. It keeps some of the quality of the old layouts in that it's tight. Maybe the tightest of all the wooded monsters brought up here. A lot of the holes were combined. This gives the feel of Safari golf on a few holes.
I'm not sure Patapsco belongs on this list. It feels much different then the others. Even though it's very wooded, power seems to come into play more then the other courses. The tees are very original, being formed with sand. When raked out properly they are world class. While many holes are more wide open then the others and require huge power shots, there are a few very technical holes.
Tyler is constantly under going change. Joey wants to keep players guessing and always test them. It's the only 27 hole course on this list. Because of this it offers the most variety. OB and mandos come into play are many holes and scores can soar quick. Many of the pins are elevated and a few have death drop offs near them. Even though Tyler is in my top 10 of courses I wonder if the gimmicks sometime take away from the course.
I only got to play Renny once. Like Tyler it seemed like a lot of time and man hours went into the course. It is well thought out and plays tough. The variety of holes and use of elevation put it high on the list. Like Tyler though I felt some of the very things that added to the course took away from it. It felt like some one was trying to add things to make it harder.
The last and probably most famous of these is Hornets Nest. In the Worlds back in 98 this type of golf became acceptable. The variety of the original course is awesome. A few bombs mixed in with gauntlet holes make this a challenge for just about any player. When I played the web though it felt a little confusing and a lot of the holes felt the same. It seemed like par 4 after par 4. 2 par 3's with elevated pins thrown in and no real par 5's.
Let's talk Wooded Monsters. With the future addition of Nocky in the mix of A tiers traveling through the North East next year, will the Pros be able to handle it or will it just be too much for them.
These courses are all linked together in the type of golf it offers, but I think the differences are often over looked. I would like to take the time to discuss the pros and cons of each of these courses.
First is Iron Hill. It's the course I know the best. I'll stick to the Gold layout as it's what the course was built to be. The tee pads and signs are second to none. The SSA is 72 and can frustrate any touring pro. The course has few if any gimmicks. No mandos, no strung out OB. The course can be played in it's Gold tournament layout at any time. No easy deuce holes. The shortest hole is 360'. Tough hole after tough hole from start to finish. 16, 17 and 18 may be the hardest finishing holes in Disc Golf. All the things I mentioned here can also be the draw back. It's tunnel shot after tunnel shot. There's no epic scenery. Unless your playing well and are truly seeing all your lines the holes can begin to run together.
Nockamixon may be the prettiest and most original of the wooded monsters. With the huge rock beds on numerous holes and overlooking a marina on others, it by far is more appealing to the eye then Iron Hill. It also offers more variety of shots. With an OB stream on numerous holes and less defined fair ways the luck factor is a little higher then I care for. That's up to debate. The true flaws come in the tee pads and signs. I've heard there are plans to install concrete tee pads. This is my second favorite. If I could combine Iron Hill and Nockamixon, I'd probably never play anywhere else.
Quakers Challenge is one of the most underrated courses I have ever played. Very tough course with great tee pads. Elevation is used to really make simple holes true test. Each birdie is earned. No gimme holes on the hole course. There are a couple of shorter holes with extremely tight fairways. Much like Iron Hill no epic scenery.
I only got to play Nevin once. It was less then a year old back in the fall of 2010. It impressed me very much. Nice use of elevation and hole after hole was a real challenge. I was really disappointed we didn't get to play it at the 2012 Worlds. Even though I loved the course, once again much like Iron Hill no epic scenery or any open holes that I remember.
French Creek was redesigned a few years ago from 2 18 hole courses to a 18 hole monster. One of the hardest layouts any where. It keeps some of the quality of the old layouts in that it's tight. Maybe the tightest of all the wooded monsters brought up here. A lot of the holes were combined. This gives the feel of Safari golf on a few holes.
I'm not sure Patapsco belongs on this list. It feels much different then the others. Even though it's very wooded, power seems to come into play more then the other courses. The tees are very original, being formed with sand. When raked out properly they are world class. While many holes are more wide open then the others and require huge power shots, there are a few very technical holes.
Tyler is constantly under going change. Joey wants to keep players guessing and always test them. It's the only 27 hole course on this list. Because of this it offers the most variety. OB and mandos come into play are many holes and scores can soar quick. Many of the pins are elevated and a few have death drop offs near them. Even though Tyler is in my top 10 of courses I wonder if the gimmicks sometime take away from the course.
I only got to play Renny once. Like Tyler it seemed like a lot of time and man hours went into the course. It is well thought out and plays tough. The variety of holes and use of elevation put it high on the list. Like Tyler though I felt some of the very things that added to the course took away from it. It felt like some one was trying to add things to make it harder.
The last and probably most famous of these is Hornets Nest. In the Worlds back in 98 this type of golf became acceptable. The variety of the original course is awesome. A few bombs mixed in with gauntlet holes make this a challenge for just about any player. When I played the web though it felt a little confusing and a lot of the holes felt the same. It seemed like par 4 after par 4. 2 par 3's with elevated pins thrown in and no real par 5's.
Let's talk Wooded Monsters. With the future addition of Nocky in the mix of A tiers traveling through the North East next year, will the Pros be able to handle it or will it just be too much for them.
Last edited: