I disagree. what do people have to add to courses that have 100 reviews that hasnt been said already? i like to write my reviews like i am the only that has reviewed said course
You discredit the power of language.
I'll use one of Donovan's reviews for example. In a review he states "There are tons of older trees here making this setting rather tranquil. For the hottest part of the day this is the course you want to be playing. The heavily wooded and shaded hopes can knock the temperature down quite a few degrees."
and "You have to love that this course has a stone monument with some tournament winners and years listed on it. The fact that there are 3 courses in this one park makes for a great outing."
This is two perfect examples of things that are new and therefore helpful and hasn't been repeated ad nauseum. Lots of reviews mention the course being wooded or having trees but Donovan doesn't just spit out factoids, he paints a picture and gives the reader a better idea of the course.