There are a lot of things that most can agree upon in course reviews such as bad drainage, too many competing non discgolf activities, bathrooms or lack of the need for them, confusing layouts, decent teepad signs, etc... The part that is confusing is how much those things are worth in a rating system. I usually look at the reviews that have lengthy text to get all that information. I could really care less about the actual rating. I also think it's kind of cheesy when the course designer is at the course asking people to review it. Our course is a really nice park but it's used for many different things so the most important thing to be telling people who are interested in travelling to come play it is what the best days to come are where you aren't going to have to worry about flag football being played in the fairway of 12 on Thursday's and Sundays and the soccer parents lined up on 9's fairway on Sunday afternoon. The course is rated at a 3.75 and after going there numerous times and having to find someplace else to go because of everything else going on I'm ready to give it a 1 disc rating but then I have to deal with the designer upset with my review periodically because we can't agree on what's important. His goal is to increase interest by padding the rating. I am more interested in giving an accurate review and let people decide based on non-opinionated facts, like are you going to be able to play the course as intended without hitting kids, or are you going to have wet feet on a dry day because a drainage structure is dumping water off the parking lot into 11's basket. I try to stay away from pin placement and course design stuff.