The official who dealt with Lisa on the ruling went out of his way upthread to say how well she handled it.
Yes, and this almost make me think that the thing Kona talked about in her Instagram post was something else
Discover new ways to elevate your game with the updated DGCourseReview app!
It's entirely free and enhanced with features shaped by user feedback to ensure your best experience on the course. (App Store or Google Play)
The official who dealt with Lisa on the ruling went out of his way upthread to say how well she handled it.
Yes, and this almost make me think that the thing Kona talked about in her Instagram post was something else
It's not. There is a lot more to the story, and I'm not going to into it here.
It's not. There is a lot more to the story, and I'm not going to into it here.
Ok,but it's things like this that make calling someone on a rule violation hard...it can become a big deal ..is it wort it?
Make the call. Accept the call. It's not personal; it's the rules.
Just a pic from a quick Google search as an example.
So what's the rules violation in this pic?
The problem here is that the called player did not know the rule she was called on. Or, maybe krupicka will clarify, she may not have interpreted the rule properly.
So what's the rules violation in this pic?
I see you still have not read the rule book.
Here's a suggestion, before commenting on anything else regarding rules don't just read the rules, learn them.
Please do you provide us with elucidation on how a supporting point in contact with the playing surface within the lie is not required at disc release. Please cite the rule, as I am not aware of it and would like to be.
i think you may have misread Jaydubs post and/or meaning........
So what's the rules violation in this pic?
Yea, I got that.
It was more in response to the general feeling that when you call a violation on someone, it can become a big deal. Is it worth it?
You call a foot fault on a player, they turn right around and give you a courtesy violation the next time you say anything louder than a whisper.
You call a time violation on a player, they spend the next month whining about how you gamed them and got in their head and that's why they lost the tournament.
You call a courtesy violation on someone, and half of the internet freaks out, harasses you, and boycotts your tour discs because they don't want to support a jerk.
If you see a penalty, call the penalty. If you get called for a penalty, accept it and move on. That goes for everyone, players and spectators alike. (well, spectators don't get to call penalties, but you get my point)
This is a tough one and the main reason you don't see it called.
Is the disc still gripped by her? You can't tell clearly by the photo...it COULD be out of her grip (you really can't see if her fingers are still on the disc or not). The photo also isn't at the moment both feet left the ground....so there could be better evidence of the disc still in her grip at the time she leaves the ground.
I think this is one rule that is impossible to enforce as it happens so quickly it is difficult for the eye to spot what happened. And video/photos are normally not allowed for rules questions (actually, I don't think they are ever allowed, but I'm not 100% sure of that).
The best solution would be for the PDGA to ban 'jump putts'.
How do you properly word it without eliminating the ability / need to follow through?
The solution, IMHO, is to extend the circle to 75 feet or so.
How do you properly word it without eliminating the ability / need to follow through?
The solution, IMHO, is to extend the circle to 75 feet or so.